Schlagwort-Archiv: Call for Papers

Call for Chapter Proposals – Organizing (for) the Future. How Organizations Manage Things to Come

Please check out this interesting call for chapters for the book ‚Organizing (for) the Future.
How Organizations Manage Things to Come‘, edited by Hannes Krämer and Matthias Wenzel (European University Viadrina, Frankfurt/Oder):

call-for-chapters_organizing-for-the-future

Call for Papers: 6. Internationaler INAS-Fachkongress 2018 „Führen in der Sozial- und Gesundheitswirtschaft: Neue Organisations- und Denkmodelle“

An der Evangelischen Hochschule Dresden findet vom 28.Februar bis 2.März 2018 der 6. Internationale Kongress der internationalen Arbeitsgemeinschaft Sozialmanagement / Sozialwirtschaft (INAS e.V.) statt. Abstracts zu möglichen Beiträgen können bis zum 15. Februar 2017 unter anderem zu den Panels und Themen Mythos ‚Führung‘, Dramaturgie von Führung als auch zu neuen Organisations- und Führungsmodellen eingereicht werden.

Hier der vollständige Call: 2018_call-for-papersinas2018_original_def-2

Vielen Dank an Marlies Froese (Evangelische Hochschule Dresden) für den Hinweis auf den Tagung!

Interesting Call for Papers – „Organizing Outsiders and their Spaces“ on 17th Annual Ethnography Symposium in Manchester

The stream „Organizing Outsiders and their Spaces“  is part of the 12th Annual Ethnography Symposium at the University of Manchester next year (30th August – 1st September 2017). Keynote speakers will be: Professor Emma Crewe (SOAS, University of London); Professor Bruno Latour (Sciences Po); Professor Bill Maurer (University of California, Irvine) and Professor Hugh Willmott (CASS Business School, London).

Convenors of Stream 20: „Organizing Outsiders and their Spaces“ are Mona Florian, Jana Costas (European University Viadrina) and Gideon Kunda (Tel Aviv University).

You can submit an abstract or proposal (not more that 500 words) by Tuesday 28th February 2017 to florian@europa-uni.de. Decisions on acceptance will be made by 30th March 2017.

More information about the conference:

http://www.confercare.manchester.ac.uk/events/ethnography/

The Call for Paper: stream-20_organizing-outsiders-and-their-spaces-1

Call for Papers – 10th International Critical Management Studies Conference (CMS) in Liverpool, 3-5 July 2017

The call for papers of the 10th International Critical Management Studies is now open. Overall there are 50 streams, including a number of streams adressing alternative forms of organization and organizing. The deadline for submission of abstracts is 31st January 2017:

Conference Streams – Call for Papers

 

Reminder – CfP on ‚Post-Growth Organizations‘

This is a reminder for our call for a special issue in Management Revue on Post-Growth Organizations (mrev-cfp-post-growth-organizations_PDF). Deadline for abstracts is September 30, 2016. Full papers must be submitted by 31 March 2017.

*Special Issue* Post-Growth Organization

Guest Editors:

Matthias Rätzer, Technical University Chemnitz, Germany

Ronald Hartz, Technical University Chemnitz, Germany

Ingo Winkler, University of Southern Denmark

 

Overview

For a couple of years now growth-driven societies have been in a permanent state of crisis. Since 2007 the global financial crisis and its aftermath are challenging our ideas of growth, well-being, consumption and work within global capitalism. Consequently, critical scholars in management and organization studies have begun to advocate alternative forms of organization and to problematize the collective imagination that ‘there is no alternative to growth’ (Parker et al. 2014; Atzeni 2012).

One important analytical dimension within the search for alternatives relates to the limits of growth in its economic, ecological and social dimension. For example, Meadows et al. (2004) explicate that a finite (world) system cannot handle an everlasting orientation toward growth without running into a collapse. Hirsch (1976) argues that social rise in a stratified society smolders, leading to social imbalances in the long term. Several authors discuss economic restrictions under the name of de-growth (Georgescu-Roegen 1977; Latouche 2009; Martínez Alier et al. 2010; Schneider et al. 2010; Kallis 2013). Schneider et al. (2010) point towards unfulfilled expectations in the context of creating win-win-situations and question the possibility of sustainable growth through technological and efficiency improvements. Relative to the social context, others discuss the label steady-state-economy, which challenges the relationship between growth and labor, solvency and consolidated public finances (Daly 1972, 1973; Lawn 2011; Blauwhof 2012).

However, there exist only few contributions discussing organizational alternatives to an orientation toward growth (Cheney et al. 2014). Some authors address growth neutral enterprises (Bakker et al. 1999; White/White 2012). Others note that neither governments nor private sector executives have any incentives supporting the development of a post-growth environment (e.g. Latouche, 2006; Ayres, 2008; Martínez Alier 2009). Therefore, the specific aim of this special issue is to substantiate the debate on post-growth, steady-state and de-growth from an organizational perspective. How can organizations respond to the limits of economic growth? How can organizations, from a post-growth perspective, promote their social worth as opposed to their monetary worth? How can organizations implement the elements of a post-growth economy, such as cutting-down and slowing down, a balance between sufficiency and dependency on consumption, institutional innovations for the society, the environment and regional economy (Paech, 2016)?

In addressing post-growth organizations (PGOs), we assume alternative organizations, featuring individual autonomy and respect, an orientation towards solidarity and cooperation, and responsibility to the future (Parker et al., 2014) to constitute a fertile ground for PGOs. Furthermore, we could imagine PGOs to develop from associations, growth neutral enterprises, co-operations, solidarity organizations, grass-root movements or even ‘traditional’ enterprises. Eventually, we do not restrict our focus on PGOs to the economic domain, but also take social and ecologic concerns, such as social entrepreneurs, into account. We call for contributions discussing different perspectives on PGOs, investigating their characteristics and limits. Furthermore, we embrace contributions investigating the range and coverage of PGOs as an organizational possibility in a future, post-growth society.

The contributions to this special issue should address one or more of the following questions:

– What characterizes the organization and the management of ‘post-growth organizations’ (PGOs)?

– Which role do the principles of autonomy, solidarity and responsibility play in PGOs? What kind of problems, contradictions and conjoint amplification are observable regarding these principles?

– Do PGOs enable us to cure some of the organizational ills created by a narrow focus on economic growth?

– What are the limits and prospects of PGOs in the transformation of capitalism?

– What organizational practices, tools and instruments are important in PGOs (e.g. accounting practices, compensation practices, decision making, regulations of working time, work-life balance, forms of participation etc.)?

– Is it possible to turn traditional organizations into PGOs?

– Which strategies (e.g. overcoming of externally defined difficulties, internal processes of storytelling, micro politics, adjustment of power) can be identified in the constitution and management of PGOs and which practices in PGOs are working well and which are not?

This is not an exhaustive list.

*Deadline* Potential contributors to the *Special Issue of Management Revue* are encouraged to submit an abstract of 1-2 pages before *30 September 2016* electronically via the online submission system at http://www.management-revue.org/submission/ using ‘Post-Growth Organization’ as article section.

Contributors will receive feedback and an invitation to submit a full paper by the end of October 2016. Full papers must be submitted by *31 March 2017*. All contributions will be subject to a double-blind review. Papers invited to a ‘revise and resubmit’ are due *31 August 2017*.

*Looking forward to hearing from you!*

Matthias Rätzer (matthias.raetzer@wirtschaft.tu-chemnitz.de) Ronald Hartz (ronald.hartz@wirtschaft.tu-chemnitz.de) Ingo Winkler (inw@sam.sdu.dk)

References

Atzeni, Maurizio (Ed.) (2012): Alternative Work Organizations. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Ayres, Robert U. (2008): Sustainability Economics: Where do we stand?. In: Ecological Economics, 67 (2), 281-310.

Blauwhof, Frederik B. (2012): Overcoming accumulation: Is a capitalist steady-state economy possible?. In: Ecological Economics, 84, 254-261.

Cheney, George/ Santa Cruz, Iñaki/ Peredo, Ana Maria/ Nazareno, Elías (2014): Worker cooperatives as an organizational alternative: Challenges, achievements and promise in business governance and ownership. In: Organization, 21 (5), 591-603.

Daly, Herman E. (1972): In Defense of a Steady-State Economy. American Journal ofAgricultural Economics, 54(5), 945-954.

Daly, Herman E. (1973):Toward a Steady-State Economy. San Francisco: Freeman. Daly, Herman E. (1991): Steady-State Economics. 2. Edition. Washington [u.a.]: Island.

Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas (1977): The steady state and ecological salvation: a thermo-dynamic analysis. Bioscience, 27(4), 266­70.

Kallis, Giorgos (2011): In defense of degrowth. In: Ecological Economics, 70, 873-880. Lawn, Philip (2011): Is Steady-State Capitalism Viable? A Review oftheIssuesand an Answer in the Affirmative. In: Costanza, Robert/ Limburg, Karin/ Kubiszewski, Ida (Ed.): Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1219, 1­25.

Martínez Alier, Joan (2009): Socially Sustainable Economic De-growth. In: Development and Change, 40 (6), 1099-1119.

Martínez Alier, Joan/ Pascaul, Unai/ Vivien, Franck-Dominique/ Zaccai, Edwin (2010): Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticism and future prospects of an emergent paradigm. In: Ecological Economics, 69, 1741-1747.

Parker, Martin/ Cheney, George/ Fournier, Valérie/ Land, Chris (Ed.) (2014): The Routledge Companion to Alternative Organization. London [u.a.]: Routledge.

Schneider, François/ Kallis, Giorgos/ Martínez Alier, Joan (2010): Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this specialissue. In: Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 511-518.

White, Doug/White, Polly (2012): Why Some Entrepreneurs Choose Not to Grow Their Businesses. In: Business Review USA, 9th March, http://www.businessreviewusa.com/finance/4048/Why-Some-Entrepreneurs-Choos e-Not-to-Grow-Their-Businesses.

Call for Papers: Organizational Practices of Social Movements and Popular Struggles: Understanding the Power of Organizing From Below

Special Issue of the Journal Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management

http://www.emeraldinsight.com/loi/qrom

Maria Ceci Misoczky, Guilherme Dornelas Camara and Steffen Böhm

 

Thematic Focus of the Special Issue

The study of social movements in the field of Organization Studies (OS) has been largely influenced by theories constructed to analyze business organizations and their interactions with formal and informal social movement organizations. The predominant approach has been to construct a theoretical model and then applying it to a largely passive object (social movements). As a consequence, OS has remained relatively blind to the processes of organizing and the knowledge produced in the organizational practices from below.

These organizational practices from below tend to be hidden from the view of hegemonic (structuralist and managerialist) organization knowledge: popular struggles, anti-corporative movements, occupy events, self-organized cooperatives, community groups, indigenous people, peasant movements, to name but a few. What also tends to be marginalized or even ignored are the organizational practices of social movements based in the South, East and other peripheral places.

There is a need to fill this gap and, in accordance with Dunayevskaya (1982), to make the movement from practice to theory. For her, the practice from below is itself a form of theory. In the same way, Rauber (2004) defends the need of articulating two dimensions of critical reflexive thought: the knowledge that is theoretically elaborated and the knowledge that emerges from below and remains, most of the time, restrained to the practices and spaces of struggle. This critical, reflexive thought and the movement from practice to theory is a qualitative one, being embedded within the realities of the social and environmental struggles of social movements and popular organizations.

Studying social movements and popular struggles from below requires qualitative methods that are, first of all, respectful of the ethical and political liberating purposes. The possibility of producing knowledge through research processes that articulate theory and praxis, that take the concrete reality as the starting point, that move from the simple to the complex, from the concrete to the abstract, that share the aim of creating a theoretical content that is relevant and meaningful because it is attached to activists’ everyday life and provides a co-constructed meaning of organizing processes (Malo, 2004).

Such research perspective has a long tradition and has been experimented with and renewed for decades. This is the case, for example, of participatory research, a confluence of critical theory and social pedagogy (mainly popular education and the critical pedagogy of Paulo Freire, 1970), intending to articulate research and practical interventions with the knowledge, the experience and the needs of local communities. Another key element is the blurring of the separation between researchers and researched, in the sense that this is a process of co-research in which the participants are all partners sharing ethical and political values (Kincheloe, McLaren and Steinberg, 2011). Another example is critical ethnography and the recognition that researchers are subjects in dialogue with the Other, and that in this encounter – following the inspiration of Mikhail Bakhtin (1982) – there is dialogue towards substantial and viable meanings that make a difference in the world.

Another important approach has been workers’ inquiry. In 1880, La Revue Socialiste asked an ageing Karl Marx to draft a questionnaire to be circulated among the French working class. Called “A Workers’ Inquiry,” it was a list of exactly 101 detailed questions, inquiring about everything from meal times to wages to lodging. The most important modern-day application of workers’ inquiry was dissident Italian Marxism in the 1960s and 1970s. Originating in the Quaderni Rossi journal, the idea was taken up by elements in Potere Operaio, Autonomia and Lotta Continua. The key aspect is the conception of the militant workers’ self-inquiry as a means for investigating situations of transformation and the relationship between conflict and antagonism within it (Panzieri, 1994). The workers’ inquiry is a kind of co-research – a form of research that tears down the division between the subject-researcher and object-researched (Malo, 2004). More recently, such approaches have been extended to militant research – the place where academia and activism meet in the search for new ways of acting that lead to new ways of thinking (Bookchin et al., 2013), connected with spaces where horizontal practices of organization are experienced.

The above mentioned approaches to qualitative research share a perspective on knowledge production in which the fixed roles of academic and activist are blurred. Following the proposition of Enrique Dussel (1974) for a methodology of liberation, we can name this approach as ‘analectics’, an attitude that requires the openness to think, to listen, to see, to feel, to taste the world from the perspective of the Other; it is conditioned by humbleness and solidarity. Analectics allows one to recognize the existence of a politics of Totality and the Other. The ‘politics of the Other is an anti-politics, it is a politics of subversion and contestation’, since it challenges established hierarchies and legal truths. It proclaims the injustice and illegitimacy of the actual system in the name of a new legitimacy (Mendieta, 2001, p. 21). Alcoff (2011, p. 67) defines analectics as ‘an epistemology for the new revolution’: a decolonized epistemology that puts ‘at the center not simply the objective conditions of global impoverishment and oppression, but the systematic disauthorization of the interpretive perspective of the oppressed in the global South’. The idea of analectics is driven ‘to get to a larger, more comprehensive, and more adequate understanding of all that is true concerning the experience of those whose experiences are most often ignored’ (Alcoff, 2011, p. 71).

Call Details

 With this Special Issue we are calling for contributions that analyze and understand the political organization of grassroots struggles and resistances against hegemonic power regimes. In our view, it is vitally important for OS to see and engage with the organizational practices of the marginalized communities of below, as otherwise our field simply contributes to the reproduction of existing power regimes, rather than seeing and analyzing those practices of hope that challenge dominant frames of organizational analysis.

We particularly invite – but do by no means restrict submissions to – manuscripts on one or several of the following topics, always in connection with the methodological aspects discussed above:

  • The analysis of social movements and popular struggles, exploring the theoretical issues that are embedded in their practices;
  • The organizational significance of ephemeral movements and/or events;
  • Theoretical dialogues with the knowledge produced by activists in their organizational processes;
  • Analysis of alternative (that is, non-hegemonic) organizations and their resistances/struggles;
  • Critical discussion and reflection on what constitutes ‘alternatives’ and what organizational practices from below can be seen as contributing to the reproduction of existing regimes of power;
  • The dialectics of organization in its multiple contradictions such as spontaneity/organization, autonomy/demands to the state, horizontality/hierarchies, leadership/leading by obeying, critical strategic reasoning/refusal of strategic reasoning;
  • Organizational practices as experiments of prefigurative politics;
  • Meanings and limits of self-organization practices;
  • The organizational dimension in occupying events;
  • Theoretical dialogues with the knowledge produced by activists in their organizational processes;
  • Research practices for studying social movements and popular struggles and their limits;
  • Examinations of and reflections on the relationship between researcher and researched;
  • Theoretical debates on research methodologies to study social movements from below.

 

Submission Details

Deadline for submission of manuscripts is 1 November 2016.

Manuscripts should be a maximum of 10,000 words in length (including tables, figures and references) and should conform to the normal submission guidelines for Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management,

http://www.emeraldinsight.com/products/journals/author_guidelines.htm?id=qrom.

 

 

References

Alcoff, L. (2011), “An epistemology of the new revolution”, Transmodernity, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 67-78.

Dunayevskaya, R. (1982), Marxism and Freedom: From 1976 until Today, Humanities Press, Amherst, NJ.

Dussel, E. (1974), Método para una filosofía de la liberación, Ediciones Sígueme, Salamanca.

Rauber, I. (2004), “La transformación social en el siglo XXI: camino de reformas o de revolución”, Pasado y Presente, No. 21, pp. 1–26.

Bakhtin, M. (1982), Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.

Bookchin, N. et al. (2013), “Militant research handbook”, available at: http://www.visualculturenow.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/MRH_Web.pdf (accessed 1 June 2016) .

Freire, P. (1970), Pedagogy of the oppressed, Herder and Herder, New York, NY.

Kincheloe, J. L.; McLaren, P. and Steinberg, S. R. (2011) “Critical pedagogy and qualitative research: moving to the bricolage”, in: Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. (ed.) Handbook of qualitative research, 3ª ed., Sage, London, pp. 163-178.

Malo, M. (Ed.) (2004), Nociones Comunes: experiencias y ensayos entre investigación y militancia, Traficantes de Sueños, Madrid.

Marx, K. (1880), “A Workers’ inquiry”, first published in La Revue socialiste, April 20, 1880, uploaded in 1997, available at: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1880/04/20.htm (accessed 1 June 2016).

Mendieta, E. (2001), “Política en la era de la globalización: crítica de razón política de E. Dussel”, in Dussel, E. Hacia una Filosofía Política Critica, Desclée de Brouwer, Bilbao, pp. 15-39.

Panzieri, R. (1994), Spontaneita‘ e organizzazione: gli anni dei „Quaderni Rossi“ 1959-1964, BFS Edizioni, Pisa.

Call for abstracts: 7th Organizations, Artifacts & Practices (OAP) workshop

The topic of the workshop will be “Collaboration and materiality: New places, communities and practices of the collaborative economy”.

The event will take place the 16th June at Singapore Management University (for the 3rd meeting of our Standing Group) and the 17th and 18th June at ESSEC campus (for the 7th Organizations, Artifacts & Practices workshop).

Deadline for submission is the 27th January 2017.

Call for Papers: call-for-papers-oap-2017

Call for special issue proposals from ‚critical perspectives on international business‘

CALL FOR SPECIAL ISSUE PROPOSALS

critical perspectives on international business

Submission dates: 31st October 2016 and 30 April 2017

Please send proposals to: Christoph Dörrenbächer, co-editor in chief (e-mail: doerrenbaecher@hwr-berlin.de)

Critical perspectives on international business (cpoib) invites proposals for special issues on topics that address international business (IB) matters from a non-mainstream, critical perspective to appear in the journal over the years 2017-2019. cpoib publishes research that critically engages with the broad field of IB, including but not restricted to, issues of globalization, IB strategies, corporate social responsibility as well as power relations both within multinational firms and between multinational firms and civil society actors. The journal promotes dialogue and new thinking and encourages authors to creatively and critically question the hegemony of multinational firms, managerial orthodoxy and the dominant IB academic discourse. cpoib publishes one or two special issues per year. The last three volumes have seen highly regarded special issues on: rising power firms, the globally mobile professional class, Brazilian multinationals and the state as well as on transnational corporations, socio-economic change and recurrent crisis. The objective of special issues in cpoib is to assemble a coherent set of empirical and conceptual/theoretical papers on topics that deserve critical thought beyond that offered by mainstream approaches to IB. The topics should be relevant, interesting and timely. A non-exhaustive list of potential themes and more information on cpoib in general is given in a recent editorial that is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-12-2015-0057.

Process

Prospective guest editors should submit a written proposal which should include:

1. A draft call for papers that: a. outlines the rationale for the special issue topic and why the special issue is needed b. explains why the special issue is targeted at cpoib and how it fits with the mission of the journal c. establishes the links to the existing literature and explains the potential for advancing scholarly conversations on the topic d. provides a justification for why a new scholarly conversation should be initiated in the case of no prior literature on the topic e. puts forward potential themes and/or research questions within the topic

2. Information about the prospective guest editors in terms of their research credentials, their research published specifically on the topic and their editorial experience. Submissions by early career scholars are welcome.

3. Where already known, potential contributing authors

All proposals will be reviewed by the editorial team of cpoib within one month after the submission. Three to four proposals will be selected and recommendations will be given in order to develop further the proposal and align it with the editorial mission and the publication timeline of cpoib. After commissioning the special issue, one cpoib co-editor in chief will serve as supervising editor supporting the special issue editors. Guest editors‘ tasks The guest editors will disseminate and publicize their call for papers, approach potential authors and manage the review process via Manuscript Central. Papers that are sent out for review must be refereed by at least two scholars, using a double-blind peer review process. It is also expected that the guest editors will contribute an introductory article (which may be full paper length) that positions the special issue in the relevant literature, sketches out its critical perspective(s) and introduces the papers included in the special issue.

For further inquiry the co-editors in chief can be contacted: Christoph Dörrenbächer, doerrenbaecher@hwr-berlin.de Snejina Michailova, s.michailova@auckland.ac.nz

Neues Journal: Zeitschrift für Diversitätsforschung und ‐management (ZDFM)

Im Barbara Budrich Verlag erscheint ab diesem Jahr die Zeitschrift für Diversitätsforschung und ‐management (ZDFM). Aus der Ankündigung:

„Die Zeitschrift für Diversitätsforschung und ‐management (ZDFM) bietet ein Forum für die wissenschaftliche Auseinandersetzung mit den Themen Vielfalt und Verschiedenheit sowie Heterogenität und Homogenität, soziale Ungleichheit/en, Diskriminierungen und Privilegierungen. Sie steht für die Bearbeitung dieser Fragen aus Sicht verschiedener Disziplinen aus den Geistes‐ und Kulturwissenschaften, den Lebenswissenschaften, Sozialwissenschaften sowie Wirtschaftswissenschaften – und sucht dabei explizit die Vielfalt auch in den entsprechend verschiedenen Forschungsansätzen und disziplinären Zugängen zur Diversität.“

Das Team der Herausgeber_innen:
Prof. Dr. Andrea D. Bührmann, Direktorin des Instituts für Diversitätsforschung, Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität Göttingen, Lehrstuhl für Soziologie der Diversität, Universität Göttingen
Prof. Dr. Ilona Ebbers, Professur für Wirtschaftswissenschaften und ihre Didaktik, Internationales Institut für Management und ökonomische Bildung, Europa‐Universität Flensburg
Prof. Dr. Brigitte Halbfas, Fachgebietsleitung Entrepreneurship Education, Universität Kassel
Dr. Iris Koall, Zentrum für Weiterbildung, Bergische Universität Wuppertal
Prof. Dr. Daniela Rastetter, Professur für Personal und Gender, Fakultät für Wirtschafts‐ und Sozialwissenschaften, Fachbereich Sozialökonomie, Universität Hamburg
Prof. Dr. Barbara Sieben, Professur für Personalpolitik, Fakultät der Geistes‐ und Sozialwissenschaften, Helmut Schmidt Universität – Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg

Weitere Informationen gibt es hier: Neuerscheinung ZDFM 2016

Zur Verlagsseite der Zeitschrift: http://www.budrich-journals.de/index.php/zdfm

Call for Papers, Special Streams and Symposia – 34th International Labour Process Conference, 4th-6th April 2017 University of Sheffield

The Call for Papers, Special Streams and Symposia for the 34th International Labour Process Conference in 2017 has now been published on the ILPC website:

http://www.ilpc.org.uk/