the culture of productivity vs. a culture of ideas | orgtheory.net

Auf orgtheory.net findet sich dieser interessante Verweis auf und eine Diskussion über das kritische Resümee von David Courpasson als Editor von Organization Studies:

the culture of productivity vs. a culture of ideas

David Courpasson is finishing his term as the editor of Organization Studies, the official publication of the European Group for Organizational Studies (EGOS). As a parting gift, he wrote an essay about what he feels is right and wrong (okay, mostly wrong) about the current state of organizational scholarship. The essay is provocative and a bit pessimistic, although not unfairly so. One of the major problems plaguing our field, Courpasson believes, is the development of a culture of productivity in social science, which seems to have most severely infected organizational and management research. In this culture of productivity, scholarship is not evaluated based on relevance or the quality of ideas but rather on the sheer volume of research that a scholar can produce. Professors are compelled to write lots of journal articles, and they push them out quickly in order to boost the length, but not necessarily the quality, of their CVs. Although he doesn’t mention it, this culture of productivity seems to have numerous institutional sources, including the practice of many departments that determine merit raises and tenure cases by “number counting” (i.e., deciding that someone deserves tenure based on the number of “A journal publications” the person has produced). …“

Hier geht es zum gesamten Eintrag:

the culture of productivity vs. a culture of ideas | orgtheory.net

 

Das könnte Dich auch interessieren …

Kommentar verfassen

%d Bloggern gefällt das: